As I was thinking about the differences in Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, I began to wonder how the story would be told from each person’s point of view. What would Ophelia think? Would she reveal feelings of guilt, anger, etc. What would Claudius write? Polonius? Each of these characters would have a very different take on the situation and respond very differently.
I began to think about this, and realized this is true for everything. EVERYTHING! Not just plays or books, but in life. For instance, people are wrongly accused all the time. People may tell their side of the story that differs completely from someone else’s.
So, when many sides are presented, who are we to believe? How do we agree with Hamlet over Ros and Guil? This is where my point comes in. If we were to read Ros and Guil are Dead first, would we be more partial to them over Hamlet? This is very similar to the way we learn about our childhood, death, etc. Many times we choose to believe what we hear first. Hamlet portrays Ros and Guil in ways that allow us to think we know who they are before we even meet them! POV can be a very dangerous tool!!