I think Candid’s intellectual and philosophical view changes
as he travels across the world, experiences new cultures, and meets other
people. Before he was expelled from the
castle, he lived a life of luxury and ease and deprived of suffering. It was
easy for him to believe Pangloss’s theory of “best of all possible worlds.” Once he is banished he encounters
manipulative soldiers that conscript him into the Bulgar army, presumably
against his will. The wars and his exercise
of free will cause him pain and suffering.
He meets corrupt, selfish, cruel, arrogant, and hypocritical people
harming one another for no reason other than for personal gain, amusement, or
another. He begins to question Pangloss’
philosophy and gravitates towards the philosophy of Jacques, then Cacambo, the
Martin and finally of the dervish. Candid maintains some of his naivety (he’s
still centered on Conegonde and tries to cling to Pangloss’ theory) but I think
it is lessened because of his experiences.
He doesn’t seem to produce his own philosophy but he adopts, or at least
listens to others and finds some of them reasonable, which is a step in
maturity. His journey outside the castle inherently involves suffering and risk
and Candid tries to understand the purpose of suffering. I think that because he
fluctuates between different philosophies and seems to adopt another belief
besides the original “perfect, predestined” Pangloss vision, he grows
intellectually and philosophically.Ca
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment