http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/dostoevsky-images-on-metro-lsquocould-cause-suicidesrsquo-1973964.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Literary Works Online
Art Watch - NOLA.com
clustrmap
Contributors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(151)
-
▼
January
(24)
- western philosophy
- Dostoevsky and Freud
- Conrad's Guilt
- Birthdays
- Joseph Conrad
- T.S. Eliot and Conrad
- Marlow and the Underground Man
- The Congo River
- Baudelaire's "Her Hair"
- The Flowers of Evil
- Manet in New Orleans
- TRAINS
- Series of Unfortunate Events
- Freud and His Legacy
- Money = Happiness
- Twisted Relationships
- The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
- Role of Liza, The Prostitute
- Prufrock, The Underground Man, and Dante
- 2 times 2 =... 5?
- Oskar and the Underground Man
- Dostoevsky's Antisemitism
- Dostoevsky Article
- Eric is gone...
-
▼
January
(24)
7 comments:
Although I do understand how the murals could possibly be considered violent or controversial, I believe that they should remain on the walls of the metro station. In fact, this article surprised me because it was always my impression that the people of Russia hold great reverence and pride for Dostoevsky and his works. Since he is notorious for being a dark artist consumed with suffering and death, I find it ironic that the people of Russia opposed the illustrations.
I wanted to find a picture of the illustrations and post it on the blog but my computer won't let me! So here is the link to a picture I found with an explanation. I agree with you Samantha but I also think that these images might be a little harsh to look at every day in a metro station. Personally, regardless of if I liked an author or not, I wouldn't really want to see images of death and suicide everyday.
oops...forgot the link!
http://www.russia-ic.com/news/show/10305/
Even though these images are harsh, I think they are directly related to his works. Dostoevsky had a great impact on Russian literature, and his dark works were productions of intellectual transitions in Europe. Like Samantha said, I also find it ironic that Russians are not in favor of the illustrations.
I don't think murals will encourage people to commit suicide. If they are even considering censoring the murals, why don't they censor the books to begin with? I agree with Samantha's point that the discussion is ironic. If they are honoring Dostoevsky they must be proud of him, including the dark imagery he often deals with, they should enforce their pride in him through going forward with the murals.
Like the article states, what did the Moscow authorities expect, happy pictures? I just feel bad for the artist of the beautiful morals, because I'm sure he put a lot of thought, creativity, and hard-work into each creation. If the Mayor decides not to let them remain in the metro station, hopefully the art will still be displayed elsewhere, perhaps a location less public where only stable-minded people could visit.
I'm of two minds on this one. I support the efforts to remember Dostoevsky and promote Russian cultural identity. However, perhaps the mural's location in a subway is too heavy-handed. Due to the graphic nature of the mural, it might have been better suited for a less busy location. Dostoevsky was a great author, but not everybody necessarily agrees with his views. If murals like these had been painted in Grand Central Station, the same complaints would be raised.
Post a Comment